About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
prakashyaji
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:39 am
Contact:

About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Post by prakashyaji »

Option 5: is not a program restriction. It's a ejb best practices guideline.
"Typically, if a bean is accessible remotely, it should be coarse grained"

Please confirm. Thanks!

regards,
Prakash Yaji

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Post by admin »

Yes, that is why it says "should" and not "must".

HTH,
Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.

prakashyaji
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Post by prakashyaji »

admin wrote:Yes, that is why it says "should" and not "must".

HTH,
Paul.
Thank you for your clarification!

leonardo
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 2:37 am
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Post by leonardo »

Just a small note. I found answer 1 this not entirely correct. For me it could also be part of the correct answers: "An enterprise bean must not use any static fields."
Infact from an Oracle article: "Nonfinal static class fields are disallowed because enterprise bean instances will behave differently depending on whether or not they are distributed."

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.518 :

Post by admin »

It disallows only non-final static fields. Final static fields are ok. The given statement is incorrect because it is talking about all static fields.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests