About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.2.346 :

[jszczepankiewicz]

Regarding explanation: "Existing EJB 3.0 and earlier applications must be supported to run unchanged in EJB 3.1 containers. All EJB 3.1 implementations must support EJB 1.1, EJB 2.0, EJB 2.1, and EJB 3.0 deployment descriptors for applications writen to earlier versions of the Enterprise JavaBeans specfication." it would be more precise to add that this is requirement for Full EJB 3.1 containers. EJB 3.1 Lite does not require the container to be able to support EJB 2.x.

[admin]

This has been updated.

Thanks for your feedback!

[Guest]

In the interest of thoroughness - in the section 21.1 of the specs there is no mentioning of a "Complete EJB". Insofar as simply "EJB" does not suffice, they seem to be using "Full EJB" term.

You can still arrive to this answer by excluding the other, clearly wrong options - so this is not a serious problem. Full or complete, it is not an official name, anyway.

[admin]

In the interest of thoroughness - in the section 21.1 of the specs there is no mentioning of a "Complete EJB". Insofar as simply "EJB" does not suffice, they seem to be using "Full EJB" term.

You can still arrive to this answer by excluding the other, clearly wrong options - so this is not a serious problem. Full or complete, it is not an official name, anyway.

Thank you for your suggestion. Complete has now been changed to full.
-Paul.

[Guest]

Complete has now been changed to full.
-Paul.

Welcome back, and thank you for your continuing effort! We missed you!