About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Moderator: admin
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 11:58 am
- Contact:
About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Why option 1 is incorrect? I thought that the JRE is included in the JDK.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10065
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
In earlier versions, JDK used to include a separate JRE. But Java 11 onwards, there is no separate JRE. The JDK includes all the features and components of JRE but there is no "JRE" as such.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 11:58 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
As I understand from your explanation that:
- On JDK 11, There is no such thing called a "separate JRE" in the JDK.
- JDK 11 includes all the features of JRE. But there is no JRE included in the JDK.
Am I correct?
- On JDK 11, There is no such thing called a "separate JRE" in the JDK.
- JDK 11 includes all the features of JRE. But there is no JRE included in the JDK.
Am I correct?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10065
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Correct. There is simply nothing like JRE anymore in Java 11.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests