About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.522 :

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
ricardoespsanto
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:57 am
Contact:

About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.522 :

Post by ricardoespsanto »

I don't understand why isn't the second option valid. There's nothing on the question stating that we need to maintain portability.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10046
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.522 :

Post by admin »

ricardoespsanto wrote:I don't understand why isn't the second option valid. There's nothing on the question stating that we need to maintain portability.
The need to maintain portability is an implicit requirement unless stated explicitly in the question. If it were not so, you can pretty much do anything and still claim that it is valid because your implementation allows it.

HTH,
Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests