WF1:
<ordering>
<before>WF2</before>
</ordering>
Guys, I'm afraid that the <name/> element cannot be omitted?
It should have been:
WF1:
<ordering>
<before><name>WF2</name></before>
</ordering>
About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.634 :
Moderators: Site Manager, fjwalraven
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:10 am
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10066
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.634 :
You are right. This has now been fixed.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 3:46 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.634 :
Hello, the same fix is needed for ordering definition of WF3.
In guestion stays:
WF3:
<ordering>
<after>WF1</after>
</ordering>
In explanation is correct definition
...Since WF3 has <after><name>WF1</name></after>...
In guestion stays:
WF3:
<ordering>
<after>WF1</after>
</ordering>
In explanation is correct definition
...Since WF3 has <after><name>WF1</name></after>...
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10066
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.634 :
This has now been fixed.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests