About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
Flavio
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
Contact:

About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Post by Flavio »

Is a question valid? Because I don't get to do anything alike.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Post by admin »

I am not sure I understand your question. Can you please explain a bit more so that we can help?
-Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.

Flavio
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Post by Flavio »

Sorry, I should have given more details.
The SfSBean didn't implement the SfSBeanRemote Interface. So how does it get to use sctx.getBusinessObject(SfSBeanRemote.class);

Shouldn't throw a IllegalStateException?

@Stateful
@Remote(SfSBeanRemote.class)
public class SfSBean  {
...
}

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Post by admin »

No, the bean class is now not required to implement any interface if it uses @Remote or @Local annotations. Please see section 4.9.7 of EJB 3.1 Spec:
The bean class must implement the interface or the interface must be designated as a local or remote business interface of the bean by means of the Local or Remote annotation or in the deployment descriptor.
HTH,
Paul.
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.

Flavio
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :

Post by Flavio »

Thank you very much :D !!!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests