Would it not have to be:The Function class must have a method with signature: public static String transformString(String arg);
Thanks for a clarification, if possible.public static java.lang.String transformString(java.lang.String arg);
Moderators: Site Manager, fjwalraven
Would it not have to be:The Function class must have a method with signature: public static String transformString(String arg);
Thanks for a clarification, if possible.public static java.lang.String transformString(java.lang.String arg);
2) I found a definite ringing endorsement though in a less-reliable-than-specs source - an interaction on code ranch. FWIW the OP confirms the full class name was needed. http://www.coderanch.com/t/451032/JSP/j ... L-Function<function-signature>java.lang.String nickName(java.lang.String) </function-signature>
Just remember in the TLD to specify the fully-qualified class name (unless it is a primitive) for each argument.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests