Enthuware

Should the comment to solution 2 not be
<jsp:directive.include file="notice.html"/>
This causes inclusion at runtime instead of translation time ?

No, the given comment is correct. include directive causes inclusion at translation time while include action causes inclusion at request processing time.

HTH,
Paul

Hello,
for option 3, the explanation do not sounds ok from my point of view

"Illegal because it does not end with /."
it is also because <jsp:directive include="notice.html"> is not a correct way to add a directive, as in proposition 2 it should be directive.include

Correct me if I'm wrong

Seb

You are right. That is also a reason.
-Paul.

Option 4 is incorrect because the attribute file doesn't exists in <jsp:include>, the mandatory attribute must be page.

Besides, the inclusion is at request time.

Joe