About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.634 :

[ArsenyKo]

WF1:
<ordering>
<before>WF2</before>
</ordering>

Guys, I'm afraid that the <name/> element cannot be omitted?
It should have been:
WF1:
<ordering>
<before><name>WF2</name></before>
</ordering>

[admin]

You are right. This has now been fixed.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.

[.peter]

Hello, the same fix is needed for ordering definition of WF3.
In guestion stays:
WF3:
<ordering>
<after>WF1</after>
</ordering>

In explanation is correct definition
...Since WF3 has <after><name>WF1</name></after>...

[admin]

This has now been fixed.
thank you for your feedback!
Paul.