Page 1 of 1
About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:07 pm
by ramy6_1
Hello ,
I don't understand why option one is not correct here , we know that EJBTransactionRolledbackException is EJBException -which is RuntimeException-
So option one is valid in this situation.
Please explain.
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:19 pm
by admin
The options are looking for the exact exception class instead of common super classes. We will update the problem statement to make it clear.
Hth,
Paul
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:21 am
by romsky
The specification is not in "EJB 3.0 core specification", but in "JSR 318: Enterprise JavaBeansTM,Version 3.1EJB Core Contracts and Requirements" .
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:00 pm
by admin
And how would you write "JSR 318: Enterprise JavaBeansTM,Version 3.1EJB Core Contracts and Requirements" in short?
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 5:35 pm
by romsky
admin wrote:And how would you write "JSR 318: Enterprise JavaBeansTM,Version 3.1EJB Core Contracts and Requirements" in short?
I would not name it 3.0, just because it is 3.1 . Fill the difference.
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-jpad.v6.2.393 :
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 8:25 pm
by admin
You are right. Done.
thank you for your feedback!