About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
Moderator: admin
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
- Contact:
About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
Is a question valid? Because I don't get to do anything alike.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10386
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
I am not sure I understand your question. Can you please explain a bit more so that we can help?
-Paul.
-Paul.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
Sorry, I should have given more details.
The SfSBean didn't implement the SfSBeanRemote Interface. So how does it get to use sctx.getBusinessObject(SfSBeanRemote.class);
Shouldn't throw a IllegalStateException?
@Stateful
@Remote(SfSBeanRemote.class)
public class SfSBean {
...
}
The SfSBean didn't implement the SfSBeanRemote Interface. So how does it get to use sctx.getBusinessObject(SfSBeanRemote.class);
Shouldn't throw a IllegalStateException?
@Stateful
@Remote(SfSBeanRemote.class)
public class SfSBean {
...
}
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10386
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
No, the bean class is now not required to implement any interface if it uses @Remote or @Local annotations. Please see section 4.9.7 of EJB 3.1 Spec:
Paul.
HTH,The bean class must implement the interface or the interface must be designated as a local or remote business interface of the bean by means of the Local or Remote annotation or in the deployment descriptor.
Paul.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.oce-ejbd.v6.1.350 :
Thank you very much
!!!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests