About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Moderator: admin
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 11:58 am
- Contact:
About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Why option 1 is incorrect? I thought that the JRE is included in the JDK.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10383
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
In earlier versions, JDK used to include a separate JRE. But Java 11 onwards, there is no separate JRE. The JDK includes all the features and components of JRE but there is no "JRE" as such.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 11:58 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
As I understand from your explanation that:
- On JDK 11, There is no such thing called a "separate JRE" in the JDK.
- JDK 11 includes all the features of JRE. But there is no JRE included in the JDK.
Am I correct?
- On JDK 11, There is no such thing called a "separate JRE" in the JDK.
- JDK 11 includes all the features of JRE. But there is no JRE included in the JDK.
Am I correct?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10383
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.i.v11.2.3034 :
Correct. There is simply nothing like JRE anymore in Java 11.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests