About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
kathy
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:00 am

About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Post by kathy »

Should the comment to solution 2 not be
<jsp:directive.include file="notice.html"/>
This causes inclusion at runtime instead of translation time ?

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10384
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Post by admin »

No, the given comment is correct. include directive causes inclusion at translation time while include action causes inclusion at request processing time.

HTH,
Paul

sebastien
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:38 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Post by sebastien »

Hello,
for option 3, the explanation do not sounds ok from my point of view

"Illegal because it does not end with /."
it is also because <jsp:directive include="notice.html"> is not a correct way to add a directive, as in proposition 2 it should be directive.include

Correct me if I'm wrong

Seb

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10384
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Post by admin »

You are right. That is also a reason.
-Paul.

basamajoe
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :

Post by basamajoe »

Option 4 is incorrect because the attribute file doesn't exists in <jsp:include>, the mandatory attribute must be page.

Besides, the inclusion is at request time.

Joe

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests