Should the comment to solution 2 not be
<jsp:directive.include file="notice.html"/>
This causes inclusion at runtime instead of translation time ?
About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :
Moderator: admin
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :
No, the given comment is correct. include directive causes inclusion at translation time while include action causes inclusion at request processing time.
HTH,
Paul
HTH,
Paul
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :
Hello,
for option 3, the explanation do not sounds ok from my point of view
"Illegal because it does not end with /."
it is also because <jsp:directive include="notice.html"> is not a correct way to add a directive, as in proposition 2 it should be directive.include
Correct me if I'm wrong
Seb
for option 3, the explanation do not sounds ok from my point of view
"Illegal because it does not end with /."
it is also because <jsp:directive include="notice.html"> is not a correct way to add a directive, as in proposition 2 it should be directive.include
Correct me if I'm wrong
Seb
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :
You are right. That is also a reason.
-Paul.
-Paul.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:40 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.701 :
Option 4 is incorrect because the attribute file doesn't exists in <jsp:include>, the mandatory attribute must be page.
Besides, the inclusion is at request time.
Joe
Besides, the inclusion is at request time.
Joe
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests